Queerying Planning: Challenging Heteronormative Assumptions by Petra L. Doan PDF

present making plans practices have mostly ignored the desires of the Lesbian, homosexual, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) neighborhood for secure city areas within which to dwell, paintings, and play. This quantity fills the distance within the literature at the making plans and improvement of queer areas, and highlights a few of the resistance in the making plans occupation to include homosexual and lesbian issues into the making plans mainstream. making plans lags in the back of different disciplines thinking about queer city matters. against this, the sector of geography has built a wealthy sub-specialty within the geographies of intercourse and gender that examines areas and the diversity of non-heteronormative populations that inhabit them. This quantity brings jointly either planners and geographers with event in making plans to ascertain a number of the primary assumptions of city making plans as they relate to the LGBT neighborhood. the 1st few chapters are monstrous revisions and expansions of prior influential paintings on making plans for non-conformist populations and the renovation of LGBT neighborhoods. next chapters contain unique contributions that draw at the wealthy literature from queer conception, making plans conception and the geography of sexualities to discover the ways in which nonconformist populations fight with heteronormative expectancies embedded in making plans idea and methods. those chapters contemplate the intersection of making plans and a number of populations together with transgendered and gender variation members. next chapters learn the ways in which diversifications within the scale of city and nearby governance impact neighborhood politics round the implementation of extra equitable regulations on the urban point. furthermore, a number of chapters severely study the results of utilizing the tolerance component to Richard Florida's "creative towns" arguments. the ultimate part includes chapters that discover the ways in which city making plans regimes were used to manage sexually-oriented companies and how this legislation of sexualized areas has implications at the heteronormativity of plans and planners. In precis, those chapters interrogate making plans perform and pose questions for tutorial planners concerning the ways in which the queer group and its wishes for areas have shifted. What do these alterations suggest for the perform of making plans forty years after the North American Stonewall uprising and looking out ahead to the following forty years? To what quantity does latest making plans perform constrain the evolution of queer groups or search to commercialize such areas to the advantage of huge builders and the detriment of marginalized individuals of the group? How could making plans perform swap to supply extra direct help to the evolution of queer humans and the areas during which they reside? This quantity attracts on those insights in addition to the stories of many of the authors to put out attainable destiny instructions for the sector of making plans to create really inclusive city areas.